So.....whatever the exact body count is, it seems to be an undeniable fact that Barack Obama has signed of on drone strikes that have killed more children than any school shooting and perhaps all combined. Yet the media doesn’t present him as a deranged and evil man and the vast majority of people don't think of him this way either. Far from it he won a Nobel Peace Prize and is Time Magazines Man of the Year.
If you don't see Obama as being just like any other child killer, how do you reconcile this contradiction? Is Obama's violence ok because it's carried out by the state? Is it more acceptable to kill children in Pakistan and Yemen than in the USA? Or is it that Obama doesn't directly intend to kill children, that they are collateral damage?