The Perdana Global Peace Foundation recently held the '9/11 Revisited Conference' in Kuala Lumpur. Coming after the Toronto Hearings last year, it would appear that the dissenting view of September 11th is becoming more prominent with the passage of time not less. Essentially, there are some questions which just refuse to go away.
One prominent question regards the way in which the three building came down. All three (Building Seven especially), look exactly like they were brought down by controlled demolition and not at all like any other building brought down by structural damage and fire. So much so that over seventeen hundred architects and engineers have now signed a petition claiming this to be the case. They may be wrong of course but that's not the point, the point as far as I'm concerned is that they are intelligent people making a well researched argument and can't be easily dismissed. That's not what you would perhaps expect.
In this presentation Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, presents a summary of the evidence he and his colleges have uncovered to support the controlled demolition hypothesis.
No comments:
Post a Comment