Remember the postal anthrax attacks of 2001? The ones that killed 5 people. The ones that came with notes saying in broken English such things as 'DEATH TO AMERICA. DEATH TO ISRAEL. ALLAH IS GREAT'. I do. I was working in an office at the time and we were issued with gloves to open the mail, just in case Osama or Saddam or whoever was responsible sent some anthrax our way. Actually, it turns out if we had received some it wouldn't have come from the Middle East, it would have come from the United States Armies own bio weapons laboratory, that was the conclusion of the FBI investigation anyway.
Robbie Martin has produced a documentary exploring the strange story surrounding these attacks, ultimately questioning if they were in fact an 'inside job' used to generate a climate of fear and beat the drums of war for Iraq. Here he is being interviewed on this by his sister, Abby -
"(NaturalNews) The French National Assembly has adopted a bill to limit exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) generated by wireless technologies - cell phones, tablets, Wi-Fi etc. This bill will mean the following:
• A ban on Wi-Fi in all childcare facilities for children under the age of 3. • Cell phone manufacturers will have to recommend the use of hand-free kits. • A ban on all advertising targeting children under 14."
"Incentives are critical to wolf conservation. My first insight into their importance came in a small schoolhouse in St. Anthony, Idaho, in 1984. I had brought together about twenty livestock producers from the area who would be affected by reintroduction of wolves. I thought that if I could better understand their concerns, together we could figure out what we needed to do to bring wolves back to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho.....
....Since the reintroduction program began in 1995, the number of wolves in the wild in Yellowstone and central Idaho has gone from zero to over four hundred animals. Currently there are thirteen wolf packs in Yellowstone. "1
Hank Fisher
A Learn Liberty video about an innovative wolf conservation program, explained by Laura Huggins of the Property and Environment Research Center (PERC). PERC explores the role free markets and property rights can play in protecting the environment and conserving endangered species by thinking in terms of establishing the correct economic incentives for conservation. This is interesting to me as typical solutions in this area consist of stronger state controls and regulations, with markets seen as being things that are hostile to conservation. We live in a time where we're in danger of witnessing the extinction of many species and surely all options need to be on the table when considering the best action to take to prevent this. Even if you find it distasteful that animals should have to justify themselves by producing profit for someone, high moral ground isn't going to feel very good when they're all extinct.
You can learn more about the work of PERC here - http://perc.org/
Definitely one of the weirdest things
I've ever come across is the prevalence of occult/mind control/demonic
themes in the popular music industry. It's so weird in fact that
there's no way I'd blog about this stuff unless I felt a cast-iron
case had been made. To my mind the anonymous blogger Vigilant
Citizen has made such a case. In his latest article he examines the
recent Grammy awards ceremony, in particular Kate Perry's black magic
demon summoning performance.
"The 2014 Grammy Awards featured a black magic witchcraft ritual disguised as a Katy Perry performance. Surprised? You shouldn’t be. This has been going on for years. We’ll look at the Illuminati Agenda pushed in the 2014 Grammy Awards."
This is not a one off for the Grammy's, last year the symbolism whilst present seems to have been less overt, whilst 2012 saw Nikki Minaj preforming a black mass
Finally an awareness of these themes seems to be creeping more into the public consciousness, with sports stars tweeting about the darkness of the Grammy's and Christian performers pulling out.1 The comedy video below has gained over 170,000 hits on youtube in the past week, its creators present the Grammy award for 'Illuminate Puppet of the Year.' With the exception of one tasteless joke about Adele, it's very funny and disturbingly accurate.
In a follow up to the 'How to Fight
Global Poverty' post, here's anarchist philosopher Stefan Molyneux
explaining the role economic freedom plays in eradicating poverty,
and how state intervention disrupts this process. We really could
see the eradication of poverty within our lifetimes!
(Additional interesting fact from the
video, apparently the British government controls more of the British
economy than the Communist Chinese government controls of the Chinese
economy!)
If you like this post then please 'like' Deep State News on facebook at:
“If there's one policy that would change the wealth of the world it
is open borders, standard estimate is that it would double the wealth
of the world.”
Professor Bryan Caplan
Depending on which newspaper you read the UK is currently either
sinking under the collective weight of 100million Bulgarian's and
Romanian's, or about six of them have arrived since the border
controls were dropped. Either way it's a good time to take a look at
the the concepts of border controls and the state's restrictions on
the free movement of people.
To be consistent with my anarchist views I would
have to advocate a world of complete free movement of people, a world
where anyone could move and work anywhere. But is this just a
Utopian fantasy? Would cataclysmic consequences ensue? According to
free-market economist Benjamin Powell, a specialist in the economic
development of poor countries, the answer is no, at least as far as
the economics goes. Immigrants are not a drag on the economy and they
don't 'steal' jobs or depress wages.
Whilst it's good to tackle the economic myths surrounding immigration
and alleviate peoples fears, one problem I have with this is that the
starting premiss is that immigrants have to justify themselves on the basis that they will benefit us. I think what
we should be questioning is by what right do people in one geographical
area deny others the right to come and work there? I can understand
how someone can steal my car say, because my car is a thing that I
consider I own. But in what sense do I own a job, maybe one that I
don't even do? If I don't own it, if it isn't my possession, how can
someone else possibly steal it from me?
But if a first world country dropped all immigration controls
tomorrow, surely that would be a disaster right? Millions of people
from the third world would flock there causing utter chaos. It would
be like building a dam to prevent flooding, then deciding that it'd
been a bad idea and de-constructing it by blowing it up. Well
according to economist Bryan Caplan no, not only should we drop
border controls but we should do so immediately. That's the position he argues in his debate
(video below) with Professor Jan Ting, that border controls are a
massive violation of human rights that leave everybody worse off and the sooner we get rid of them the better for all.
Maybe future generations will look back and laugh at the illiteracy of a people who thought that enforcing massive restrictions on human movement could somehow be a good thing.
If you like this post then please 'like' Deep State News on facebook at:
"I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics in the city of Sochi on the Black Sea next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us, and they will not move in the Syrian territory’s direction without coordinating with us. These groups do not scare us. We use them in the face of the Syrian regime but they will have no role or influence in Syria’s political future.”
Prince Bandar Bin Sultan, director general of the Saudi Intelligence Agency, to Vladimir Putin, August 20131
In the video below geopolitical annalist James Corbett speculates on
the deeper power structures that may lie behind the recent and tragic
bombings in Volgograd. Mr. Corbett speculates that the bombings may be connected to Russia's support for the Assad Regime in Syria and points to the rather interesting statement from Prince Bandar Bin Sultan to Vladimir Putin last August, where he claimed Saudi Intelligence controlled Chechen terrorist groups and that he could protect the Olympics from them, in return for a compromise over Syria.
It's interesting that whilst Russia Today did
not directly raise the possibility of a foreign state being involved in the bombings, by inviting James Corbett on the show they basically ensured that it
would be brought up! Given this is his specialist area it's hard to
imagine this wasn't intentional.
1. The transcript of the full conversation is availible at -
